728x90
Question
What are the chunk limitations in Informix Dynamic Server (IDS) and Extended Parallel Server (XPS)?
Answer
The IBM Informix® database servers have different limitations on the number of chunks and the maximum chunk size.
The following table shows the maximum number of chunks and the maximum chunk size that the IBM Informix onLine (OnLine), IBM Informix Dynamic Server (IDS), and IBM Informix Extended Parallel Server (XPS) database servers can create.
Version | Number of chunks | Maximum Chunk Size |
OnLine 5.x with 2KB pages | Varies from 12 to about 50 (see below) | 2GB |
OnLine 5.x with 4KB pages | Varies from 26 to about 100 (see below) | 2GB |
XPS 8.1x and 8.2x | 32767 | 2GB |
XPS 8.3, 8.4, and 8.5x | 32767 | 1 TB |
IDS 7.x | 2047 | 2GB |
IDS 9.1, 9.2, and 9.3 | 2047 | 2GB |
IDS 9.4/IDS 10.0 | 32766 | 2 Billion Pages |
Number of chunks in onLine 5.x
In onLine 5.x a data page is used to store information about the chunks. 28 bytes of the page are used for various structures. Out of the memory left, each chunk uses up 28 bytes plus one byte for every character in the complete path name of the chunk. So the shorter the full path names of your chunks are the more chunks you can have.
The ranges in the table above are based on the maximum allowed path name of 128 characters and a realistic minimum path name length of 12 characters.
Units used in this document
This document uses the base-two definitions for memory units as follows:
- KB = kilobyte = 1024 bytes = 2 10 bytes
MB = megabyte = 1024 KB = 2 20 bytes
GB = gigabyte = 1024 MB = 2 30 bytes
TB = terabyte = 1024 GB = 2 40 bytes
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21105436
728x90
'Informix > informix reference' 카테고리의 다른 글
How to get version of Informix JDBC Driver (0) | 2014.03.07 |
---|---|
SQL to find list of the tables in a particular chunk (0) | 2014.03.06 |
Dynamic turning on and off of SQL Explain (0) | 2014.01.02 |
What is the 'partnum' and what does it means? (0) | 2014.01.01 |
Determining the number of free table pages without locking (0) | 2013.12.23 |